My current career is social work and as a career in social sciences it has a very broad curriculum and allows me to access the range of disciplines of a social nature such as sociology, psychology, philosophy, economics, statistics, history, research methodology, this is not It means that the disciplinary training is of low quality, but if it generates a type of "rigid" education in which it is not allowed to choose based on people's interest, I would like to be able to study gender in 1 year, but I have it in 4 years. we need more freedoms now. The academic load is difficult and extensive because it means not only participating / attending classes, but also reading texts, researching and evaluating the content, I do not even know if the academic load really helps timely learning (we must acquire knowledge, not memorization). My study plan lasts 5 years (or more) in general, which bothers me because in Europe it is only 3 years of bachelor's degree. The faculty facilities are mostly acceptable (we have toilet paper in the bathrooms) but in the same way, the money that is personally invested in the fees does not correspond to the "service" that is provided in return. I think the use of technology is fine and they are always implementing new technologies in the corresponding spaces.
University teaching difficult to describe ... Mainly very academic and I believe that the absence of a concrete practice of this knowledge does not allow us to motivate our study spaces.
I think very similar in terms of academic load and learning and I find it worrying that social work has a very academic teaching without much practice
ResponderEliminarI also don't like that the race is so academic and little practice.
ResponderEliminarI agree that the amount of readings not always help us learn. And I didn't know that in Europe it was only 3 years, it would be great if it was like that here
ResponderEliminar